文献导读 | 新手教师对反馈信念和具体实施方式

提示：点击上方"英语写作教学与研究"免费关注哦

文献导读栏目将会把最新期刊文章进行整理发布，每次推荐一篇SSCI或者CSSCI文章，供大家阅读浏览。

同时，我们欢迎各位学者专家后台留言跟我们联系，授权给我们推荐您的文章，期待您的到来。

本期题目：“I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard’’: A novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices

摘要

    This case study investigated teacher feedback beliefs and practices of a pre-service L2 writing teacher over one academic semester. Kim, the focal participant, was a second year MA TESOL student and taught an English composition course to ESL students at the university level. Data sources included four sets of commented-on students’ essays, a reflective journal, two semi-structured interviews, and member checking with the teacher. Students’ essays were coded for four types of written corrective feedback (WCF) (direct, direct with explanation, indirect, indirect with explanation) and compared to Kim's beliefs, as discussed in her journals and interviews. The analyses show, among other findings, that Kim believed in providing feedback on global concerns and, to a lesser extent, on local issues and in offering explanations to WCF instances. However, a detailed analysis of her actual practices revealed some mismatches, such that local WCF (83.9%) significantly outnumbered global WCF (16.1%). Other beliefs included the following themes: Feedback needs to be contextualized, is time-consuming, is a process that requires practice, and can lead to better writing. Relevant pedagogical implications for L2 teacher education and recommended reflective tools to support teachers as they develop feedback practices are discussed in the paper.

简介Brief Introduction

本文是个案定性研究，选择了一位二年级的TESOL硕士为受试，来研究这位新手教师对于学生写作反馈的自我信念和实际操作。数据来源于受试四篇对学生写作的反馈、一篇反思日记、两次半结构性访谈。结果发现反馈信仰和实际操作还是有差别的，具体请阅读文章。

研究问题 Research Questions 

(1) What are the beliefs and practices of a novice teacher concerning response to ESL student writing?

(2) What informs a novice teacher’s decision-making processes about WCF?

研究方法 Research Methods 

    个案研究方法

读后感 Comment 

    1. 本文是比较好的定性研究范例，可以用来学习。

    2. 本文语言相对比较容易，可读性比较强，没有让人懵懂的数据分析，但是这并不代表这样研究容易做，因为结果部分对于数据分类整理需要强大的理论和文献支持。

 • ❤️END❤️ • 

原文下载、学术共读

回复关键词：原文

等你加入

精彩推文回顾